Tragedy struck last night
A man with undivided attention protested his belief into his loud speaker
on top of the podium.
The crowd I would say was under the minimum of stage short, the count
was also worthless down to the point.
The man who proclaimed to be the speaker
pledged on stage with his spirits high as he proclaimed his words in brief
phrases.
He announced to the people how beneficial the first 10 grounding laws were
and how innocent he became after learning the rules to his sin.
“Once and for all, the life we struck and the let down we faced were all in the
God’s plan.” He said.
“To the people who were never visited by the tenth seeds and the laws from the
forefathers, please be kind and be generous towards the newcomers who are in
session learning our rules.” As he sighed in silence.
The prominent crowd were all in legions towards his various point in his speech
but candidly, one viewer procrastinated to ask a question towards his phrases.
“Hey sir, if you don’t mind, please rephrase the last paragraph to me and to the
crowd with your tools. If so, what sinister motives were to trying to include during your lessons
in law ? ” He asked.
In a harassing voice, the man answers
“I’m quite aware of those things you were pondering of but if you don’t mind, what makes you
the third loudest speaker who cannot hear my praises towards your rule and your questions.”
“The rest of the crowd seems like they understood my fundamental logic towards your own antics.”
In reply, the speaker concluded to his answer.
“I am very pleased with what faced in last 5 years, but during these generous times my
growth in wording became more of a tragic than natural rhetoric in itself. I became
more intuitive and less in motives than the phrases I went through during those
harsh days. I am not a pet chief or a conic slave. But mere a human who requires rules to
distinguish days from nights and nights from natural ends. Please forgive my infatuations
with those times but my beginning stages were all in the medium as the rules became cruel
with my name.”
The response given my the man in the crowd were more in sync than the questions
he described to the speaker. He was more in shock by the forgiveness to the truth he announced
than to the speech the man gave to himself.
Can it be those things he understood were more towards ethics than the words
that were written under the paper presuming as the law ?
Or was the speaker in control of his own brief as the pages in his speech
were all turning as the season progressed towards his notes. No one knew
and the crowd all left unsung to his last words as the speaker fell foward
down to his knees.






